EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Substance Use and Delinquency Among Youths Entering Texas Youth Commission Facilities: 1994


Eric V. Fredlund, Ph.D., David Farabee, Ph.D., Leslie Blair, M.A., and Lynn S. Wallisch, M.A


Acknowledgements and Copyright

PDF LogoFull Report in Adobe PDF format (160 pages -- 515kb).

INTRODUCTION

Substance Use and Delinquency Among Youths Entering Texas Youth Commission Facilities: 1994 is one of a family of criminal justice studies undertaken by the Texas Commission on Alcohol and Drug Abuse to examine patterns of substance use among high-risk populations including adult inmates, probationers, and TYC youths and to explore the relationship between substance use, crime, family dysfunction, and mental health. The Public Policy Research Institute at Texas A&M University administered the survey in the field. Interviews with 1,030 youths ages 12-17 were conducted by trained interviewers from May 19, 1994 to November 17, 1994.

A majority of youths committed to TYC could be classified as substance dependent and in need of treatment. In addition, many had educational deficiencies and had been involved in gangs and selling drugs. Their family lives often included substance abuse and involvement with the criminal justice system as well as other indications of dysfunction. It is notable that 79% of the youths entering TYC facilities had close relatives with histories of serious criminal justice involvement. Moreover, 18% of these youths were already parents themselves and some had small children living at home when they were committed to TYC. A majority of TYC youths (70%) had siblings under the age of 18 living in homes with the same environmental influences.

These factors suggest there is a great possibility that a multigenerational cycle of maladjustment, substance use, and criminality exists and will continue unless there are effective programs that address the full range of problems these youths and their families face. Failure to break this cycle of dysfunction could have repercussions for many generations.

DESCRIPTION OF THE SAMPLE
Demographics

Table 1. Demographic Characteristics of Youths Who Entered TYC Facilities, 1994

All Youths Younger Youths
(Ages 12-13)
Middle Youths
(Ages 14-15)
Older Youths
(Ages 16-17)

No. Percent No. Percent No. Percent No. Percent
Total 1030 100.0% 68 6.6% 455 44.2% 507 49.2%
Gender
Male 941 91.4% 61 89.7% 410 90.1% 470 92.7%
Female 89 8.6% 7 10.3% 45 9.9% 37 7.3%
Race/Ethnicity
White 166 16.1% 6 8.8% 65 14.3% 95 18.7%
African American 405 39.3% 23 33.8% 182 40.0% 200 39.4%
Hispanic 423 41.1% 35 51.5% 195 42.9% 193 38.1%
Other 36 3.5% 4 5.9% 13 2.9% 19 3.7%
Educational Status
Dropped out 262 25.4% 15 22.1% 105 23.1% 142 28.0%
Dropped out, completed GED 27 2.6% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 27 5.3%
Not attending school 57 5.5% 1 1.5% 31 6.8% 25 4.9%
Attend alternative school 162 15.7% 13 19.1% 66 14.5% 83 16.4%
Attend regular school 520 50.5% 39 57.4% 252 55.5% 229 45.2%
Family Structure
Mother and father 236 22.9% 19 27.9% 97 21.3% 120 23.7%
Mother and stepfather 283 27.5% 17 25.0% 129 28.3% 137 27.0%
Stepmother and father 57 5.5% 3 4.4% 24 5.3% 30 5.9%
Mother only 324 31.5% 23 33.8% 147 32.3% 154 30.4%
Father only 36 3.5% 1 1.5% 18 4.0% 17 3.4%
Household headed by grandparent 75 7.3% 3 4.4% 30 6.6% 42 8.3%
Other 19 1.8% 2 2.9% 10 2.2% 7 1.4%


Reasons for TYC Commitment

Table 2. Self-Reported Offenses that Led to Commitment to TYC Facilities

All Youths Younger Youths
(Ages 12-13)
Middle Youths
(Ages 14-15)
Older Youths
(Ages 16-17)

No. Percent No. Percent No. Percent No. Percent
Total Sample 1030 100.0% 68 6.6% 455 44.2% 507 49.2%
Crimes Against Persons
Subtotal 466 45.2% 33 48.5% 222 48.8% 211 41.6%
Murder 74 7.2% 3 4.4% 47 10.3% 24 4.7%
Kidnapping 4 0.4% 0 0.0% 2 0.4% 2 0.4%
Assault 194 18.8% 12 17.6% 88 19.3% 94 18.5%
Robbery 148 14.4% 13 19.1% 63 13.8% 72 14.2%
Drive-by shooting 3 0.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 3 0.6%
Sexual assault 43 4.2% 5 7.4% 22 4.8% 16 3.2%
Crimes Against Property
Subtotal 374 36.3% 29 42.6% 176 38.7% 169 33.3%
Auto theft 137 13.3% 7 10.3% 64 14.1% 66 13.0%
Burglary 138 13.4% 13 19.1% 65 14.3% 60 11.8%
Arson 17 1.7% 1 1.5% 9 2.0% 7 1.4%
Shoplifting/theft 41 4.0% 4 5.9% 24 5.3% 13 2.6%
Vandalism 7 0.7% 1 1.5% 3 0.7% 3 0.6%
Criminal trespass 34 3.3% 3 4.4% 11 2.4% 20 3.9%
Drug Crimes
Subtotal 107 10.4% 4 5.9% 39 8.6% 64 12.6%
Possession drugs 67 6.5% 4 5.9% 30 6.6% 33 6.5%
Drug sales 40 3.9% 0 0.0% 9 2.0% 31 6.1%
Other Offenses
Subtotal 343 33.3% 19 27.9% 150 33.0% 174 34.3%
Accomplice 1 0.1% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 0.2%
Carrying weapon 70 6.8% 5 7.4% 32 7.0% 33 6.5%
Curfew violation 3 0.3% 0 0.0% 3 0.7% 0 0.0%
Other 133 12.9% 7 10.3% 53 11.6% 73 14.4%
Runaway 25 2.4% 2 2.9% 13 2.9% 10 2.0%
Probation violation 104 10.1% 3 4.4% 46 10.1% 55 10.8%
DK/RF 7 0.7% 2 2.9% 3 0.7% 2 0.4%
Note: Because some youths reported more than one crime as the reason for their commitment to TYC, some of the percentages will not total to 100% whereas others will equal more than 100%.


SUBSTANCE USE PATTERNS AMONG TYC YOUTHS
As Table 3 indicates, TYC teens were very likely to be substance users prior to their commitment. Nearly nine out of ten TYC youths had used illegal drugs at least once in their life; six out of ten had used illegal drugs within their last month on the street. Surprisingly, these teens reported lifetime use of marijuana at about the same rate as lifetime use of alcohol. They were more likely, however, to use marijuana than alcohol during the past month.

Definitions and Limitations
In this report, lifetime use refers to the percentage of youths entering TYC who had used a substance at least once in their life. Past-month or current use refers to the percentage of youths entering TYC who had used a substance during the last thirty days prior to incarceration.

Because the prevalence of use data in this report is based on self report, it is possible that some underreporting has occurred. Although a review of the literature shows that self-report data are fairly accurate,1 a 1994 study of juvenile arrestees in 11 cities showed that recent use of illicit substances other than marijuana were greatly underreported, especially by African-American youths.2

Licit Substances
Tobacco Alcohol Inhalants
Illicit Drugs

Marijuana Powdered Cocaine Crack Cocaine Uppers Downers Heroin Other Opiates Psychedelics

Table 3. Prevalence and Recency of Use Among Youths Entering TYC Facilities: 1994

Ever UsedPast MonthPast Year
(Not Past Month)
Not Past YearNever Used
Tobacco (All) 83.1% 38.5% 31.0% 13.6% 16.9%
Youths 13 and younger 80.9% 41.2% 26.5% 13.2% 19.1%
Youths 14 and 15 84.0% 38.0% 32.5% 13.4% 16.0%
Youths 16 and older 82.6% 38.7% 30.2% 13.8% 17.4%
Alcohol (All) 89.4% 51.8% 26.9% 10.6% 10.6%
Youths 13 and younger 80.9% 45.6% 23.5% 11.8% 19.1%
Youths 14 and 15 87.8% 51.7% 25.7% 10.4% 12.2%
Youths 16 and older 91.9% 52.8% 28.5% 10.7% 8.1%
Marijuana (All) 88.0% 57.2% 22.5% 8.3% 12.0%
Youths 13 and younger 80.9% 45.6% 25.0% 10.3% 19.1%
Youths 14 and 15 87.4% 59.7% 21.6% 6.2% 12.6%
Youths 16 and older 89.5% 56.6% 23.1% 9.9% 10.5%
Inhalants (All) 33.4% 11.0% 12.5% 9.9% 66.6%
Youths 13 and younger 38.2% 13.2% 17.6% 7.4% 61.8%
Youths 14 and 15 34.7% 12.3% 13.8% 8.6% 65.3%
Youths 16 and older 31.6% 9.5% 10.7% 11.4% 68.4%
Cocaine (All) 36.2% 14.0% 15.6% 6.5% 63.8%
Youths 13 and younger 27.9% 10.3% 16.2% 1.5% 72.1%
Youths 14 and 15 37.1% 15.6% 16.0% 5.5% 62.9%
Youths 16 and older 36.4% 13.0% 15.2% 8.1% 63.6%
Crack (All) 13.4% 4.6% 6.4% 2.4% 86.6%
Youths 13 and younger 10.3% 5.9% 4.4% 0.0% 89.7%
Youths 14 and 15 13.2% 3.5% 6.4% 3.3% 86.8%
Youths 16 and older 14.0% 5.3% 6.7% 2.0% 86.0%
Cocaine or crack (All) 38.5% 15.7% 16.6% 6.2% 61.5%
Youths 13 and younger 29.4% 11.8% 16.2% 1.5% 70.6%
Youths 14 and 15 38.9% 16.3% 16.7% 5.9% 61.1%
Youths 16 and older 39.4% 15.8% 16.6% 7.1% 60.6%
Uppers (All) 16.5% 4.1% 9.3% 3.1% 83.5%
Youths 13 and younger 10.3% 2.9% 7.4% 0.0% 89.7%
Youths 14 and 15 16.5% 4.8% 9.7% 2.0% 83.5%
Youths 16 and older 17.4% 3.6% 9.3% 4.5% 82.6%
Downers (All) 21.8% 6.6% 10.4% 4.8% 78.2%
Youths 13 and younger 16.2% 8.8% 5.9% 1.5% 83.8%
Youths 14 and 15 21.3% 7.3% 10.1% 4.0% 78.7%
Youths 16 and older 22.9% 5.7% 11.3% 5.9% 77.1%
Heroin (All) 8.4% 2.2% 4.2% 1.9% 91.6%
Youths 13 and younger 5.9% 2.9% 2.9% 0.0% 94.1%
Youths 14 and 15 7.5% 1.8% 4.4% 1.3% 92.5%
Youths 16 and older 9.5% 2.6% 4.1% 2.8% 90.5%
Other opiates (All) 8.5% 2.7% 4.3% 1.6% 91.5%
Youths 13 and younger 1.5% 1.5% 0.0% 0.0% 98.5%
Youths 14 and 15 7.5% 2.6% 4.2% 0.7% 92.5%
Youths 16 and older 10.5% 3.0% 4.9% 2.6% 89.5%
Psychedelics (All) 30.5% 10.8% 15.1% 4.6% 69.5%
Youths 13 and younger 22.1% 5.9% 16.2% 0.0% 77.9%
Youths 14 and 15 28.1% 9.7% 15.2% 3.3% 71.9%
Youths 16 and older 33.7% 12.4% 15.0% 6.3% 66.3%
Any illicit drug (All) 89.1% 61.7% 21.5% 6.0% 10.9%
Youths 13 and younger 82.4% 51.5% 26.5% 4.4% 17.6%
Youths 14 and 15 87.9% 63.1% 20.9% 4.0% 12.1%
Youths 16 and older 91.1% 61.7% 21.3% 8.1% 8.9%


Table 4. Comparison of Lifetime and Past-Month Substance Use: TYC Youths vs. In-School Youths: 1994

Lifetime Use Past-Month Use

TYC
Youths
In-School
Youths*
Ratio of
Difference
TYC
Youths
In-School
Youths*
Ratio of
Difference
Tobacco 83.1% 57.9% 1.44 38.5% 25.6% 1.51
Alcohol 89.4% 78.9% 1.13 51.8% 41.6% 1.25
Marijuana 88.0% 34.6% 2.55 57.2% 17.2% 3.33
Inhalants 33.4% 16.0% 2.09 11.0% 4.0% 2.72
Cocaine 36.2% 6.5% 5.60 14.0% 2.2% 6.35
Crack 13.4% 2.2% 6.06 4.6% 0.7% 7.01
Cocaine or crack 38.5% 6.9% 5.58 15.7% 2.4% 6.58
Uppers 16.5% 5.4% 3.07 4.1% 1.5% 2.72
Downers 21.8% 3.9% 5.65 6.6% 1.1% 5.91
Hallucinogens 30.5% 5.0% 6.08 10.8% 1.7% 6.37
Any illicit drug 89.1% 36.0% 2.48 61.7% 18.3% 3.36
* Weighted for age, race/ethnicity, and gender to match TYC sample.


Comparisons to Other Populations



Table 5. Comparison of Lifetime and Past-Month Use: TYC Youths vs. Adult Inmates

Lifetime Use Past-Month Use

TYC
Youths
Adult
Inmates*
Ratio of
Difference
TYC
Youths
Adult
Inmates*
Ratio of
Difference
Tobacco 83.1% 81.4% 1.0 38.5% 66.6% 0.6
Alcohol 89.4% 87.5% 1.0 51.8% 47.6% 1.1
Marijuana 88.0% 76.2% 1.2 57.2% 16.3% 3.5
Inhalants 33.4% 15.7% 2.1 11.0% 0.6% 18.2
Cocaine 36.2% 50.1% 0.7 14.0% 12.1% 1.2
Crack 13.4% 31.3% 0.4 4.6% 9.3% 0.5
Cocaine or crack 38.5% 55.4% 0.7 15.7% 17.9% 0.9
Uppers 16.5% 28.4% 0.6 4.1% 3.5% 1.2
Downers 21.8% 26.1% 0.8 6.6% 3.3% 2.0
Heroin 8.4% 22.0% 0.4 2.2% 6.4% 0.4
Other opiates 8.5% 11.0% 0.8 2.7% 1.9% 1.4
Psychedelics 30.5% 29.0% 1.0 10.8% 2.8% 3.9
Any illicit drug 89.1% 79.2% 1.1 61.7% 32.0% 1.9
* Weighted for race/ethnicity and gender to match TYC sample.


Table 6. Comparison of Lifetime and Past-Month Substance Use Among TYC Youths: 1994 vs. 1989

Lifetime Use Past-Month Use

TYC
Youths
1994
TYC
Youths
1989
Ratio of
Difference
TYC
Youths
1994
TYC
Youths
1989
Ratio of
Difference
Tobacco 83.1% 85.9% 0.97 38.5% 54.4% 0.71
Alcohol 89.4% 91.2% 0.98 51.8% 53.4% 0.97
Marijuana 88.0% 78.8% 1.12 57.2% 44.0% 1.30
Inhalants 33.4% 39.3% 0.85 11.0% 12.6% 0.87
Cocaine 36.2% 39.2% 0.92 14.0% 17.5% 0.80
Crack 13.4% 24.6% 0.54 4.6% 12.4% 0.37
Cocaine or crack 38.5% 46.5% 0.83 15.7% 23.3% 0.68
Uppers 16.5% 29.1% 0.57 4.1% 10.3% 0.40
Downers 21.8% 20.7% 1.05 6.6% 6.7% 0.99
Heroin 8.4% 10.6% 0.79 2.2% 2.9% 0.77
Other opiates 8.5% 9.8% 0.87 2.7% 2.5% 1.09
Psychedelics 30.5% 34.2% 0.89 10.8% 12.8% 0.84
Any illicit drug 89.1% 81.2% 1.10 61.7% 50.6% 1.22


DEPENDENCE AND ABUSE
Dependence and Abuse Compared to Other Populations


Figure 1. Rates of Alcohol and Drug Abuse Dependence Among Selected Populations (Unweighted)

CRIMINAL HISTORIES


Table 7. Lifetime Reporting of Delinquent Acts: TYC Youths 1994
Act% Who Have Committed
Assault/no weapon 82.5%
Carried gun on person 72.2%
Burglary 66.9%
Shoplifting 65.9%
Vandalism 62.8%
Car theft 62.1%
Graffiti 53.8%
Took weapon to school 53.7%
Shot at someone 53.3%
Drug sales/other than crack 51.2%
Bought stolen goods 49.8%
Threatened someone with gun 48.5%
Drug sales/crack cocaine 44.9%
Drive-by shooting 39.1%
Seriously injured/killed someone 38.7%
Gambling 37.1%
Robbery with gun 36.2%
Auto parts theft 32.7%
Robbery/no weapon 30.5%
Threatened someone with knife 24.9%
Cut someone with knife 22.8%
Pick pocketing/purse snatching 20.3%
Other crime not mentioned 20.2%
Forgery or fraud 16.1%
Stole from employer 9.4%
Prostitution/procuring 8.8%
Robbery with knife 7.1%
Sexual assault or rape 5.9%


Drug Sales
Gangs and Gang-Related Violence
FAMILY AND SOCIAL BACKGROUND

Figure2. Family Problems Experienced by TYC Youths, by Gender

MENTAL HEALTH
CONCLUSIONS

The need for treatment among the TYC population is clear, especially in light of the number of studies that have demonstrated the link between criminal activity and addiction. This study shows that delinquency and substance use begins early in these adolescentsą lives, usually around the age of 12. Many of these teens, especially the females, have family and mental health problems which must also be addressed. The need for alternative sanctions and comprehensive treatment for these offenders is extremely important if we are to address the enormous social and economic costs they present to society.

Effective intervention early in their delinquency careers would be the ideal method of dealing with these youths to cut short their criminal and drug-using careers as would community-based programs targeting high-risk children before age 12. The high proportion of TYC youths involved in gangs and violent crimes suggests a need for gang and violence prevention and intervention to be included with substance use prevention and intervention.

There are a number of innovative intervention programs in existence including one in which juvenile probationers were involved in recreation, education, and job readiness programs and received ongoing counseling and medical care as needed in addition to traditional probation supervision. In this program, the recidivism rate was only 7% for probationers compared to 35% of other violent juveniles.3

Another alternative would be treatment in a therapeutic community instead of incarceration. A therapeutic community is a long-term residential treatment program which assumes that prosocial behavior must be learned. Because these adolescents usually return to the same environment in which they were involved prior to entering TYC, an aftercare component is much needed. Maintaining the positive impact of treatment requires an extended network of positive role models and peers who can provide support and it means involving the families of the adolescents in treatment and providing education and/or vocational training as well.

Although young women constitute a small percentage of TYC commitments, they require programs and treatment focusing on their many problems. They tend to use marijuana, cocaine, crack, and heroin at higher rates than the TYC males and they are more likely to have children in their care.

ENDNOTES
  1. See D. Farabee, Substance Use Among Male Inmates Entering TDCJ-ID: 1993 (Austin, Tx.: Texas Commission on Alcohol and Drug Abuse, 1994), p. 4-5 and Substance Use Among Female Inmates Entering TDCJ-ID: 1994 (Austin, Tx.: Texas Commission on Alcohol and Drug Abuse, 1995), p. 6-7 for discussion of using self-report and a review of the literature.
  2. M. Fendrich and Y. Xu, "The Validity of Drug Use Reports from Juvenile Arrestees," The International Journal of the Addictions, 29(8): 971-985, 1994.
  3. A. Morales, "A Clinical Model for the Prevention of Gang Violence and Homicide," in Substance Abuse and Gang Violence, ed. R. C. Cervantes (Newbury Park, Cal.: Sage Publications, 1992), p. 109-110. In addition to Morales' chapter, Substance Abuse and Gang Violence has descriptions and discussions of programs around the country. Although many focus on gangs and violence, they could be adapted for substance use intervention. In fact, some of these programs incorporate principles that have been used in substance intervention programs in the past.

PDF LogoFull Report in Adobe PDF format (160 pages -- 515kb).